while they have a wonderful defense and missile defense system, they have quite a few major missiles. not the ones from southern lebanon, but big warheads, conventional warheads. and only if you need to get through to land to cause tremendous casualties. when people privately or publicly come and say why aren't they acting. the leader of the country of israel has stepped talk about the repercussions, and that includes large civilian casualties. one should only strike as a measure of last resort and not because other external-internal forces are asking him to. lou: and the more bellicose iran becomes, the algorithm for a pre-emptive strike, the nuclear plants ourself evidence. the algorithms are pre-emptive strikes as they become more bellicose and threatening. what is him if you will, the sum of little? we will there be coming in your judgment in a pre-emptive strike by israel and, perhaps, a united states. >> well, it's nothing new in world history, especially recent world history. i like to give the example of the movie, the bridge on the river of pride. you don't blow up the bridge